<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Views on &quot;Dark Art&quot;]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I spotted a recent upload <a href="http://tracker.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=93966" rel="nofollow ugc">http://tracker.gaytor.rent/details.php?id=93966</a> in which the description states it's a collection of… "433 pictures of torture, cannibalism etc. Authors: <a href="http://katharsis.net" rel="nofollow ugc">katharsis.net</a>, Dante, Link, Malex... Warning: also women, but only as tormentors."</p>
<p dir="auto">I haven't downloaded the collection, but the 4 picture examples didn't look all that graphic, however 2 comments left on the torrent page are basically very negative towards the content and uploader. I found the reaction interesting, just what is considered acceptable or unacceptable in 'erotic' pictures where there are no victims if the basis of the drawings are from the artist's imagination?</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/4396/views-on-dark-art</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 11:40:53 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/4396.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 12:04:27 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Views on &quot;Dark Art&quot; on Sun, 02 Jan 2011 14:20:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">makes sense, I suppose.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.gaytor.rent/post/73001</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.gaytor.rent/post/73001</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[notquiteme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 14:20:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Views on &quot;Dark Art&quot; on Sun, 02 Jan 2011 14:14:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">well i did download it and, no disrespect to the up loader, i did not find it particularly arousing… some of the images were well created and interesting to view while others were bordering on juvenile doodling... that being said i was not forced to view it and did so of my volition and formed my opinion at that stage. i did not think it was particularly offensive considering that it was imaginary. i did find the implied genital mutilation off putting but then to each his own. there are a few things on this website that i find unsavoury but it is my choice whether i view them or not and that should be the bottom line. if i am offended by something that poses no real threat to anyone then i will disregard it.</p>
<p dir="auto">OK! that's me off my soap box.</p>
<p dir="auto">best wishes</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.gaytor.rent/post/73000</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.gaytor.rent/post/73000</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[vara81]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 14:14:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Views on &quot;Dark Art&quot; on Sun, 02 Jan 2011 14:04:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I think the post was… somehow related to an extreme BSDM but carried way too far.  Now if nobody will download it i think it will send a certain message to the uploader, but i actually don't see much to object to.  If it's just art, then even the most deviant of them will have some form of commentary that can be positively spun.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.gaytor.rent/post/72998</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.gaytor.rent/post/72998</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[notquiteme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 14:04:31 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>