<![CDATA[That underneath angle…]]>I need to know, is it just me?

I always get aggravated when they do that under camera angle where all you see is some ass getting plowed by some dick.

When I like a porn star, it's because of characteristics of that particular actor.  So I like to see who he is, his body, face, etc.

But so many agencies will do that under shot where it could literally be anyone.  I keep trying to skip past it and they keep going back to it : ' (

Anyone else not a fan? or do some of you actually like it?

]]>https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/39064/that-underneath-angleRSS for NodeWed, 08 Apr 2026 11:12:34 GMTSun, 06 May 2018 03:53:42 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to That underneath angle… on Sun, 27 May 2018 12:47:37 GMT]]>I am not a fan of gay porn videography in general. Too many close-ups and weird camera angles for me. Moody lighting - where you cannot see a thing. 'Action' camerwork where the viewer's eye is never allowed to settle. Lazy ass camera-work where the lens follows a performer's face and half of the action is missed. I'm not blind. I don't need the camera to get in so close that I can see the hair follicles on a guy's balls. I like the whole picture - seeing who's doing what to whom. But studios/videographers so lack originality that they copy each other relentlessly. One person's bad habits soon spread.

I could go on (and on). However, I have not paid for any form of media (porn, movies TV or music) since around 2007/2008. So, if a porn scene is awful enough for me to shout at the screen and curse the man/woman/cretin who filmed it, I am happy to erase it from my PC and move on. ;D

]]>https://community.gaytor.rent/post/241387https://community.gaytor.rent/post/241387Sun, 27 May 2018 12:47:37 GMT