@Frederick:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/18/clinton-considers-contesting-election-results.html

Not sure if you read the article or not but this was her response on the issue of contesting the election and I quote
''Clinton later said there have been “scholars” and “academics” who argue challenging the results would be possible - but Clinton herself dismissed the idea."

Hopefully this will clear up your confusion!

I don't doubt you, however, that is how Hillary says things without being held accountable for them.  For instance.. she often starts and interview or speech by spending 10 seconds saying how she takes responsibility for her loss…  then spends the next hour blaming everybody else for her loss.

I bet she didn't name those "scholars" and "academics" who argue she could challenge the results.  They don't exist.  It's her idea, nobody else has mentioned that.  She is like a child saying "Well I COULD have done this, but I'm not because I'm a good little bitch".  She's a bad bitch, and should have just kept her mouth shut instead of restating what "someone else" might have said.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/18/clinton-considers-contesting-election-results.html

Not sure if you read the article or not but this was her response on the issue of contesting the election and I quote
''Clinton later said there have been “scholars” and “academics” who argue challenging the results would be possible - but Clinton herself dismissed the idea."

Hopefully this will clear up your confusion!

Good grief! Go away already! Why does she need to constantly seek attention???

People often "say" that someone is "crazy", but in Hillary's case.. that bitch is truly nuts.  If that bitch had won the election, SHE would have been impeached. 
That explains why Bill Clinton didn't put any effort into helping her get elected.  Billy KNOWS she is nuts.