I solved this problem years ago.

The US military has automatic tracking machine guns that shoot various sizes of bullets depending on the system.    Rather than an ugly wall, we could just install these along the border.

Also, instead of cucking to illegals, we need to get tough on them.  We need to be as tough as Mexico is.    Illegals should never be given amnesty and never, ever be given priority in the queue over those who went the legal route. +

They round up homeless children in Mexico and have them shot.

The US military has automatic tracking machine guns that shoot various sizes of bullets depending on the system.    Rather than an ugly wall, we could just install these along the border.

Also, instead of cucking to illegals, we need to get tough on them.  We need to be as tough as Mexico is.    Illegals should never be given amnesty and never, ever be given priority in the queue over those who went the legal route. +

@Frederick:

it will be a HUUUGE savings for the USA with a wall.

He could raise tariffs on goods from Mexico, but we would have to quadruple our consumption of those Mexican goods for ten years. That 4 billion dollars is less than the 6 billion Trump wants to start with. That's before the wall is built. So when do the savings kick in, 15 years from now when the wall is done and we can sell all those Mexican goods we overbought for 10 years straight to pay for it?

I'll admit, 750 million a year is a lot cheaper than 6 billion a year. But if all the salary paid this year is supposed to be more than the salaries paid 15 years from now (when the savings from having that wall instead of active patrols kicks in) won't a lot a people have to be fired? Trump just asked for 350 million to hire more border patrol agents. That will hire 500 of them, but Trump said he wanted 10,000 new immigration officers and 5,000 new Border Patrol agents, so he still has a way to go. Will these be the people he will be firing in 15 years when the savings kick in?

I don't know.. world is going to hell and there doesn't seem to be a way to fix it. 
Here's one idea.. instead of paying labor to build a wall,  round up those trying to sneak in, and put them to work build and maintain the wall. 
Anybody able to travel so many miles on foot must be very strong. 
In fact, build housing on the mexican side of the wall for those laborers to live in.. and give them food and some pay.

Here's another idea.. put U.S. citizens who hire or otherwise assist illegal immigrants in jail.

I wish instead of spending money putting a wall up to keep out Mexicans, we would build a massive bridge linking us to Columbia!  Take a look at Chaturbate.. I don't think there are any males in Columbia that are not super attractive twinks!

it will be a HUUUGE savings for the USA with a wall.

He could raise tariffs on goods from Mexico, but we would have to quadruple our consumption of those Mexican goods for ten years. That 4 billion dollars is less than the 6 billion Trump wants to start with. That's before the wall is built. So when do the savings kick in, 15 years from now when the wall is done and we can sell all those Mexican goods we overbought for 10 years straight to pay for it?

I'll admit, 750 million a year is a lot cheaper than 6 billion a year. But if all the salary paid this year is supposed to be more than the salaries paid 15 years from now (when the savings from having that wall instead of active patrols kicks in) won't a lot a people have to be fired? Trump just asked for 350 million to hire more border patrol agents. That will hire 500 of them, but Trump said he wanted 10,000 new immigration officers and 5,000 new Border Patrol agents, so he still has a way to go. Will these be the people he will be firing in 15 years when the savings kick in?

@Frederick:

Now Jose is about to sneak in behind Irma

The Chicano storm sneaking in after the Lithuanian storm. A bit like Fabian replacing Hurricane Frederic.

@Frederick:

Trump called for a wall to keep out the Mexicans.. but so far it has not been funded.

I thought Mexico was supposed to pay for it. Did their check bounce

I'm not sure what Trump was referring to about paying for the wall.  Perhaps he has some sort of trade adjustment in mind. 
In 2015, nearly $4 billion was spent on border patrol.  Obviously, no matter who pays for the wall, it will be a HUUUGE savings for the USA with a wall. 
I wonder if the people who are against the wall, are also against border patrol?    I don't hear anybody objecting to border partrol.

Now Jose is about to sneak in behind Irma

The Chicano storm sneaking in after the Lithuanian storm. A bit like Fabian replacing Hurricane Frederic.

@Frederick:

Trump called for a wall to keep out the Mexicans.. but so far it has not been funded.

I thought Mexico was supposed to pay for it. Did their check bounce