<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[California politics updates: Today&#x27;s the day bills live or die in Sacramento]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">A ballot initiative proposed Friday would allow California consumers to know what personal information businesses are collecting from them, what they do with it — and to who they are selling it.</p>
<p dir="auto">Backers of the initiative, dubbed the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, are aiming for a spot on the November 2018 statewide ballot. The measure would establish a consumer's right to request that a business disclose what categories of personal data it gathers, and to say no to the sale of any of that information without fear of losing services or facing discrimination.</p>
<p dir="auto">It would require businesses to make those disclosures free of charge within 30 days.</p>
<p dir="auto">Robin Swanson, a general consultant for the measure, says it would "give Californians more control over what personal information is shared."</p>
<p dir="auto">The proposed ballot initiative, led by Mary Ross, president of Californians for Consumer Privacy, comes several months after President Trump signed into law a repeal of privacy regulations limiting what broadband providers can do with customer data.</p>
<p dir="auto">source: <a href="http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-proposed-california-ballot-initiative-1504313223-htmlstory.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-proposed-california-ballot-initiative-1504313223-htmlstory.html</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/35272/california-politics-updates-today-s-the-day-bills-live-or-die-in-sacramento</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 22:26:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/35272.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2017 14:38:37 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to California politics updates: Today&#x27;s the day bills live or die in Sacramento on Sat, 02 Sep 2017 17:33:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/ravena1" aria-label="Profile: ravena1">@<bdi>ravena1</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">A ballot initiative proposed Friday would allow California consumers to know what personal information businesses are collecting from them, what they do with it — and to who they are selling it.</p>
<p dir="auto">Backers of the initiative, dubbed the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, are aiming for a spot on the November 2018 statewide ballot. The measure would establish a consumer's right to request that a business disclose what categories of personal data it gathers, and to say no to the sale of any of that information without fear of losing services or facing discrimination.</p>
<p dir="auto">It would require businesses to make those disclosures free of charge within 30 days.</p>
<p dir="auto">Robin Swanson, a general consultant for the measure, says it would "give Californians more control over what personal information is shared."</p>
<p dir="auto">The proposed ballot initiative, led by Mary Ross, president of Californians for Consumer Privacy, comes several months after President Trump signed into law a repeal of privacy regulations limiting what broadband providers can do with customer data.</p>
<p dir="auto">source: <a href="http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-proposed-california-ballot-initiative-1504313223-htmlstory.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-proposed-california-ballot-initiative-1504313223-htmlstory.html</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">This is great.. and it would create a massive problem for Facebook.</p>
<p dir="auto">One thing though.. although Trump did repeal a privacy regulations.. that is not quite what it seems.  The existing regulations were unfair.  The existing regulations restricted everybody with a few exceptions - most notably FACEBOOK.  Those regulations were crap, so Trump nuked them.  Now, because the dysfunctional restrictions are gone…  NEW restrictions can be made that INCLUDE Facebook!</p>
<p dir="auto">Restrictions that don't include Facebook are meaningless.. which is why Trump nuked them.  He won't nuke the restrictions that include the fake news propagators.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.gaytor.rent/post/226557</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.gaytor.rent/post/226557</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frederick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2017 17:33:34 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>