Women's heads would explode if any money was taken away from them or if more money was given to other cancers and they didn't get a trillion percent more.

https://www.cancer.gov/types/common-cancers

But outside of access, healthcare should not seek gender or racial equality with funding simply because the healthcare needs will vary based on their genetic makeup.  Even the transgendered are still susceptible to the diseases associated with their birth genders.  For example, a man who becomes a woman will still have the increased risk of developing heart disease seen in males.

Ok, we have a candidate (pick a gender) who talks about gender equality and all that.   One of their big health care issues is equalizing funding based solely on rates of occurrence, not on gender.

Most women would wet their panties over this.

Radical feminists know the truth and hack the candidate's servers and leak the info.

The candidate loses by a landslide because that meant that lung cancer would get the most and prostrate cancer would get the 2nd most, with breast cancer getting slightly less at 3rd most.

Women, feminist or not, will never allow that to happen.

@Frederick:

Listen to her attempt to say "Sequestration"  she says "Seacrestration"

http://media.merriam-webster.com/audio/prons/en/us/mp3/s/seques04.mp3

George W. Bush couldn't get "nuclear" right

Neither could Jimmy Carter.. and Jimmy Carter has a degree in "nucular physics"

Maxine Water's has an ebonics level mastery of the English Language.

In high school, when I was 14.  I once had a black english teacher.  She didn't like me much.. because I was often correcting her english.

Yo Neither could Jimmy Carter.. an' Jimmy Carter has uh degree in "nucular physics"

Maxine Water's has an ebonix level mastery o' da cracker ass english Language.

In high skoo, when ah wuz 14.  ah once had uh black cracker ass english beotch.  She didn't like me much.. cuz ah wuz often correcting her cracker ass english you know das right!

Youtube Video

Youtube Video

Interesting that the left is always being blamed for playing "identity politics.," yet you are willing to throw 50% of the population under the bus on the basis of gender alone.

That is because 50% of the population vote with their vaginas…
Far too many women base their votes upon women's healthcare and abortions.

@Frederick:

This withered old crone has got to go.

(edited for brevity…)

Maxine Waters, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, and Elizabeth Warren are four fantastic examples why a woman should never be president.  They don't have any regard for the truth, and will say anything at all and defend it like it was their own baby (unless hey had it aborted - then fuck it).

As far as Maxine Waters (great photo montage), or moonbats from either far edge of the political spectrum, the reason for their "life terms" can be summed up in a single word:  gerrymandering.

Now, I have to take issue when you cite four female politicians you don't like, and extrapolate it to a blanket prohibition about women being president.  Let's take that a step further, to a global perspective, and here's an interesting article about current and "cumulative time of" women leaders in various countries:
 
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/03/08/women-leaders-around-the-world/

With a little more research, you would see that many of these women leaders hold very positive poll numbers from their citizenry.  I look at someone like Angela Merkel of Germany, and while you may not like her immigration stance, she has been a fixture for several terms.  And looking back, did you, as a conservative, think that Margaret Thatcher did a shitty job in Great Britain for all that time?

Now, there have been two recent, and very prominent disasters concerning female leaders that come to mind:  former Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff, and Park Geun-hye of South Korea.  These were largely financial mismanagement and corruption (bribery) issues.

YET… when we compare this pair of naughty dames to, oh, say, North Korea's Supreme Leader, Kim Jong-un; and current Syrian President, Bashar al-Assad, I find the idea of bashing women as leaders to be a very weak cause.

I'm not going to disagree with you in this post.. but rather add some to it. 
In regards to Angela Merkel, she started out fine, but she is way past her prime and needs to go.  12 years of her is about 4 too many.  Also, she was extremely disrespectful of President Bush. 
In regards to Thatcher, she was great for a long time, but she stuck around too long also.  She was PM for 11 years.  Her support of Pinochet and that horrible Poll Tax were inexcusable.  By the way.. Obamacare is essentially a poll tax.

Nicola Sturgeon only cares about independence.

Several of the other women leaders only care about advancing their feminist agenda.    Like 99.999999999% of feminists, they don't care about facts, just sound bites and purposely misleading stats.

Listen to her attempt to say "Sequestration"  she says "Seacrestration"

http://media.merriam-webster.com/audio/prons/en/us/mp3/s/seques04.mp3

George W. Bush couldn't get "nuclear" right

This withered old crone has got to go.

(edited for brevity…)

Maxine Waters, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, and Elizabeth Warren are four fantastic examples why a woman should never be president.  They don't have any regard for the truth, and will say anything at all and defend it like it was their own baby (unless hey had it aborted - then fuck it).

As far as Maxine Waters (great photo montage), or moonbats from either far edge of the political spectrum, the reason for their "life terms" can be summed up in a single word:  gerrymandering.

Now, I have to take issue when you cite four female politicians you don't like, and extrapolate it to a blanket prohibition about women being president.  Let's take that a step further, to a global perspective, and here's an interesting article about current and "cumulative time of" women leaders in various countries:

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/03/08/women-leaders-around-the-world/

With a little more research, you would see that many of these women leaders hold very positive poll numbers from their citizenry.  I look at someone like Angela Merkel of Germany, and while you may not like her immigration stance, she has been a fixture for several terms.  And looking back, did you, as a conservative, think that Margaret Thatcher did a shitty job in Great Britain for all that time?

Now, there have been two recent, and very prominent disasters concerning female leaders that come to mind:  former Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff, and Park Geun-hye of South Korea.  These were largely financial mismanagement and corruption (bribery) issues.

YET… when we compare this pair of naughty dames to, oh, say, North Korea's Supreme Leader, Kim Jong-un; and current Syrian President, Bashar al-Assad, I find the idea of bashing women as leaders to be a very weak cause.