Did Warmbier beat someone up and show himself as a violent thug before stealing that flag and then attempting to assault a cop like Michael brown?
you guys still acting like the only difference between these two guys and their situations was skin color? ::)

They're still acting like this, because SJWs are by far the most racist group of people in American society today – both against white people for being unable to empathize and blacks/minorities for the soft racism of low expectations.

This thread being a clear and blatant example of that ugly racism.

Disgusting.

Warmbier was white, Brown was black.
To white people, Otto Warmbier became a symbol of those who suffer under the weight of evil, despotic, dictatorial regimes, as well as an emblem of destroyed innocence that should have never suffered such pain in a situation which was ultimately not his fault.
To white people, Michael Brown became a symbol of society out of control, of a parisitic class of criminally-minded individuals with no respect for authority and who deserve all the misery of the world as punishment for situations usually of their own fault.

OBVIOUSLY, these are not all the differences as already pointed out multiple times.  Putting effort into making a post with cutesy graphics doesn't change your faulty assumptions.

I do love how the Obama Admin are crying about "due process" in Ferguson, when they are the ones that destroyed it on every college campus in the US.

SJW's will always claim that Michael Brown was a lovely, cuddly,  teddybear, who dindu nuffin.

Of course they refuse to accept that 100 FBI agents and 20,000 pages of reports cleared the police in this case and in general.    Our (then) race baiter in chief sent them in hoping to find racism.   Of course he was silent when the findings came out because it didn't come out the way he wanted.

Before you assert that the police were cleared, isuggest you read the report linked by Spintendo.

https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/press-releases/attachments/2015/03/04/ferguson_police_department_report_1.pdf

Of course they refuse to accept that 100 FBI agents and 20,000 pages of reports cleared the police in this case and in general.    Our (then) race baiter in chief sent them in hoping to find racism.  Of course he was silent when the findings came out because it didn't come out the way he wanted.

←Otto Warmbier and Michael Brown→

• Both were young Americans in their 20s

• Both were detained for stealing

• In both North Korea and the State of Missouri the death penalty is not used as punishment for stealing.

• Despite this, both men did end up being killed.

• Punishment by death is inconsistent with the crime of stealing what they stole.

Differences

• Warmbier was white, Brown was black.

• To white people, Otto Warmbier became a symbol of those who suffer under the weight of evil, despotic, dictatorial regimes, as well as an emblem of destroyed innocence that should have never suffered such pain in a situation which was ultimately not his fault.

• To white people, Michael Brown became a symbol of society out of control, of a parisitic class of criminally-minded individuals with no respect for authority and who deserve all the misery of the world as punishment for situations usually of their own fault.

@raphjd:

His race has nothing to do with my opinion on that.  Any piece of filth like him deserves it, regardless of race.

So then, does raphjd equally blame the vandalism carried out by Warmbier as the result of his own poor choices as he did with the black rioters in Ferguson for the vandalism they created? in the end, are Brown and Warmbier equally assesed blame?

Of course not.

In raphjd's constructed world of white privilege, a sentence of death for the white person who steals is absurd, unwarranted, and would never happen. On the other hand, stealing a cigarillo would be a sentence of death for the black person who stole it.

So then we ask "Why" they arent held equally. Raphjd is minimalism personified in the sparse details he offers:

@raphjd:

Michael Brown was a thug.

With this, we're left wondering what special insight that only raphjd has access to that is informing him of Michael Brown's "thugness", a thugness so evil, so vile, that he deserved to be executed for stealing beef jerky…. "Think that's all there is on him?" raphjd asks. To quote Grand Moff Tarkin, "If only saying it made it so." Raphjd's feelings on Michael Brown are obviously much more esoteric than he would like us to think they are. In the absense of reasons we're left with labels. In the above example, the use of a substitute word, "thug." In looking closely at that word, we can sense raphjd's feelings, and indeed, we can sense his yearning to be able to say even more... things once freely uttered in society so long ago… archaic, brutally austere words which demonstrated perfectly how white men back then didn't need to justify the things they said. In those good old days before PC censorship a man could eschew all the long-winded pussy explanations and just respond to pesky questions and comments with:

@raphjd:

[desc=Not an actual quote from raphjd, for illustrative purposes only.]"Because, he's a N****R — that's why."[/desc]

—and instantly the discussion would be over. By saying "he's a thug" raphjd is trying to recreate a powerful 'conversation-closer'. It's not as effective as the N-word, but it's all raphjd has left in a world shrunken by political correctness. And in it, we see the real reasons for Brown's vileness and Warmbier's glowing, do-no-wrong type- sainthood in raphjd's eyes: "Because, one's white and the other's a n****r — that's why."

@raphjd:

Even sending in 100 FBI agents, and 20,000 pages of reports, no wrong doing was found.

They found no wrongdoing only in those reports that were released in your head…. you know, the ones no one else on the planet would have ever read or seen because they're imaginary. The real Department of Justice Report on Policing in Ferguson (which I'll bet good money you've never laid eyes on) found a systemic pattern of government abuse, corruption and injustice, with policing for profit, profiling minorities, and regularly abusing Ferguson residents’ First and Fourth Amendment rights.

Bless your heart though for trying.  :blind:

Did Warmbier beat someone up and show himself as a violent thug before stealing that flag and then attempting to assault a cop like Michael brown?
you guys still acting like the only difference between these two guys and their situations was skin color? ::)

• Both were young Americans in their 20s

• Both were detained for stealing

• In both North Korea and the State of Missouri the death penalty is not used as punishment for stealing.

• Despite this, both men did end up being killed.

• Punishment by death is inconsistent with the crime of stealing what they stole.

Differences

• Warmbier was white, Brown was black.

• To white people, Otto Warmbier became a symbol of those who suffer under the weight of evil, despotic, dictatorial regimes, as well as an emblem of destroyed innocence that should have never suffered such pain in a situation which was ultimately not his fault.

• To white people, Michael Brown became a symbol of society out of control, of a parisitic class of criminally-minded individuals with no respect for authority and who deserve all the misery of the world as punishment for situations usually of their own fault.

@raphjd:

His race has nothing to do with my opinion on that.  Any piece of filth like him deserves it, regardless of race.

So then, does raphjd equally blame the vandalism carried out by Warmbier as the result of his own poor choices as he did with the black rioters in Ferguson for the vandalism they created? in the end, are Brown and Warmbier equally assesed blame?

Of course not.

In raphjd's constructed world of white privilege, a sentence of death for the white person who steals is absurd, unwarranted, and would never happen. On the other hand, stealing a cigarillo would be a sentence of death for the black person who stole it.

So then we ask "Why" they arent held equally. Raphjd is minimalism personified in the sparse details he offers:

@raphjd:

Michael Brown was a thug.

With this, we're left wondering what special insight that only raphjd has access to that is informing him of Michael Brown's "thugness", a thugness so evil, so vile, that he deserved to be executed for stealing beef jerky…. "Think that's all there is on him?" raphjd asks. To quote Grand Moff Tarkin, "If only saying it made it so." Raphjd's feelings on Michael Brown are obviously much more esoteric than he would like us to think they are. In the absense of reasons we're left with labels. In the above example, the use of a substitute word, "thug." In looking closely at that word, we can sense raphjd's feelings, and indeed, we can sense his yearning to be able to say even more... things once freely uttered in society so long ago… archaic, brutally austere words which demonstrated perfectly how white men back then didn't need to justify the things they said. In those good old days before PC censorship a man could eschew all the long-winded pussy explanations and just respond to pesky questions and comments with:

@raphjd:

[desc=Not an actual quote from raphjd, for illustrative purposes only.]"Because, he's a N****R — that's why."[/desc]

—and instantly the discussion would be over. By saying "he's a thug" raphjd is trying to recreate a powerful 'conversation-closer'. It's not as effective as the N-word, but it's all raphjd has left in a world shrunken by political correctness. And in it, we see the real reasons for Brown's vileness and Warmbier's glowing, do-no-wrong type- sainthood in raphjd's eyes: "Because, one's white and the other's a n****r — that's why."

@raphjd:

Even sending in 100 FBI agents, and 20,000 pages of reports, no wrong doing was found.

They found no wrongdoing only in those reports that were released in your head…. you know, the ones no one else on the planet would have ever read or seen because they're imaginary. The real Department of Justice Report on Policing in Ferguson (which I'll bet good money you've never laid eyes on) found a systemic pattern of government abuse, corruption and injustice, with policing for profit, profiling minorities, and regularly abusing Ferguson residents’ First and Fourth Amendment rights.

Bless your heart though for trying.  :blind:

@Frederick:

A whacko professor thinks that removing a banner from a wall of one's hotel justifies being severely tortured, sentenced to 15 years hard labor, and left in a vegetative coma for over a year until he ultimately died.

Kathy Dettwyler, an anthropology professor, wrote Tuesday that Warmbier was "typical of a mindset of a lot of the young, white, rich, clueless males who come into my classes."

I would suggest handing in homework assignments on time in that bitch's class!
Soon Kathy Dettwyler will be like school in the summertime.. "no class!"  Hey Hey Hey! (My Cosby Kids homage).

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/professor-otto-warmbier-got-%E2%80%98what-he-deserved%E2%80%99/ar-BBD66To?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

that's because the professor is a douche.  People lead short meaningless lives and some are so intimidated by it that they have to put partisan bullshit and "white privilege" in to situations because they need to reinforce their cult somehow.

That douche will say she was "Blinded by the white, and wrapped up over Comey and the people on the right"

Youtube Video

Youtube Video

A whacko professor thinks that removing a banner from a wall of one's hotel justifies being severely tortured, sentenced to 15 years hard labor, and left in a vegetative coma for over a year until he ultimately died.

Kathy Dettwyler, an anthropology professor, wrote Tuesday that Warmbier was "typical of a mindset of a lot of the young, white, rich, clueless males who come into my classes."

I would suggest handing in homework assignments on time in that bitch's class!
Soon Kathy Dettwyler will be like school in the summertime.. "no class!"  Hey Hey Hey! (My Cosby Kids homage).

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/professor-otto-warmbier-got-%E2%80%98what-he-deserved%E2%80%99/ar-BBD66To?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp

that's because the professor is a douche.  People lead short meaningless lives and some are so intimidated by it that they have to put partisan bullshit and "white privilege" in to situations because they need to reinforce their cult somehow.

And what, according to raphjd, was the heinous crime for which Michael Brown was gunned down "like the dog that he was"? His crime was shoplifting a cigarillo and beef jerky from a liquor store.

Perhaps If Warmbier had added a cigarillo and beef jerky to the poster he stole?  I think what you meant to say was:

Do you honestly believe that Michael Brown's only guilt that day was to shoplift?    SERIOUSLY?!

Michael Brown was a thug.

Even with Obama's race baiting and sending in 100 FBI agents, and 20,000 pages of reports, no wrong doing was found.    In fact, the only lie to be found was "Hands up, don't shoot".

There's a lot of question surrounding the whole North Korea thing.

@raphjd:

Unless I missed something, not a single conservative said the horrible shit that liberals said about the case.

That's because Warmbier is white. When it's a black person killed, then the favored conservative talking point magically becomes: "That's what you get for not following THE LAW."

Oh ffs, stop race baiting.

A better comparison would be harambe.  A black male whose life probably wasn't even in danger, had officials take EVERY pre-caution possible to ensure that he survived.  Is that black privilege?  Because you KNOW that if it were a white male, black twitter would be UP IN ARMS about white privilege.

Oh wait:

When you have a gun which could easily kill an officer, follow orders or expect to get shot.  Plenty of white men get killed in this manner, by the way.

In an ENTIRELY unrelated case, you have ZERO empathy for a young kid whose life was taken away by a totalitarian regime.  Instead, you turn it into about how much you can race bait as possible.

Fucking horribly racist and disgusting post.  You make me sick.  Fuck off with your racist bullshit.

apples and oranges

Is it really? Let's ask raphjd.

@raphjd:

Do I care that Michael Brown was gunned down like the dog he was?  FUCK NO.   His race has nothing to do with my opinion on that.   Any piece of filth like him deserves it, regardless of race.

And what, according to raphjd, was the heinous crime for which Michael Brown was gunned down "like the dog that he was"? His crime was shoplifting a cigarillo and beef jerky from a liquor store.

Perhaps If Warmbier had added a cigarillo and beef jerky to the poster he stole?  I think what you meant to say was:

@jazuko:

apples and oranges    posters and cigarillos

@raphjd:

Unless I missed something, not a single conservative said the horrible shit that liberals said about the case.

That's because Warmbier is white. When it's a black person killed, then the favored conservative talking point magically becomes: "That's what you get for not following THE LAW."

What the 'Black-Lives Matter' Movement Doesn't Get: Follow the Law, and You've Nothing To Fear
Arizona Republic/USA Today Editorial
June 16, 2015

Obeying three simple words would have changed the outcome for Ebin Proctor, Michael Brown, Eric Garner, the Gaver family at Walmart and several others. Those three simple words are "Obey Police Commands." It all starts with that. A community asks, how do people think it will turn out if they swear, shout at or lie to the police, resist arrest, fight or physically attack the cops? Behavior such as that seldom ends well.

These are not the Village People dressed up as cops, they are highly trained, well equipped, motivated professionals with the ability to summon help or additional manpower. Ebin Proctor was on probation for assaulting a police office in Chino Valley, a bad decision. Now he is dead because of another bad decision; to fight with a cop and wrestle for his gun. His death was avoidable by obeying police commands. Eric Garner may not have been able to breath, but he shouldn't have been selling cigarettes illegally on the street corner in the first place and most of all, he should have obeyed police requests to cease and desist his resisting of their lawful arrest.

Respect the police. Obey their commands. If they make a mistake, sort it out later.

apples and oranges

Unless I missed something, not a single conservative said the horrible shit that liberals said about the case.

That's because Warmbier is white. When it's a black person killed, then the favored conservative talking point magically becomes: "That's what you get for not following THE LAW."

What the 'Black-Lives Matter' Movement Doesn't Get: Follow the Law, and You've Nothing To Fear
Arizona Republic/USA Today Editorial
June 16, 2015

Obeying three simple words would have changed the outcome for Ebin Proctor, Michael Brown, Eric Garner, the Gaver family at Walmart and several others. Those three simple words are "Obey Police Commands." It all starts with that. A community asks, how do people think it will turn out if they swear, shout at or lie to the police, resist arrest, fight or physically attack the cops? Behavior such as that seldom ends well.

These are not the Village People dressed up as cops, they are highly trained, well equipped, motivated professionals with the ability to summon help or additional manpower. Ebin Proctor was on probation for assaulting a police office in Chino Valley, a bad decision. Now he is dead because of another bad decision; to fight with a cop and wrestle for his gun. His death was avoidable by obeying police commands. Eric Garner may not have been able to breath, but he shouldn't have been selling cigarettes illegally on the street corner in the first place and most of all, he should have obeyed police requests to cease and desist his resisting of their lawful arrest.

Respect the police. Obey their commands. If they make a mistake, sort it out later.

@pppucci:

A PhD does not cure stupidity. And stop lumping liberals together.  You may not like us, but were are not a monolithic group.

…actually.. the liberals ARE a "monolithic" group.  They are very united in their efforts to undermine the government.  Virtually NONE of them are supporting Trump - and Trump isn't even considered to be conservative enough by many Republicans.  Imagine what the demoboobs would be doing if the president was conservative!

Probably the same thing Democrats did during the Reagan and Bush administrations.  But you are right, Frederick, most of our objections to Trump have little to do with ideology.  He is simply not qualified, nor does he have the temperament to be President.

A PhD does not cure stupidity. And stop lumping liberals together.  You may not like us, but were are not a monolithic group.

…actually.. the liberals ARE a "monolithic" group.  They are very united in their efforts to undermine the government.  Virtually NONE of them are supporting Trump - and Trump isn't even considered to be conservative enough by many Republicans.  Imagine what the demoboobs would be doing if the president was conservative!