<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Possible wrinkle in Supreme Court]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I have mentioned that there are 4 liberal, 4 conservative, and one swing Supreme Court Justices.<br />
Three of the liberals are quite elderly and could retire or die at any time.<br />
However, I just found out that the swing vote Kennedy who is 80 years old might retire within a month!</p>
<p dir="auto">That would probably result in 5 conservative vs 4 liberal justices. <br />
Thanks to moonbat Harry Reid - who didn't anticipate that the Republican's would take over all 3 branches of government, It only takes a simple majority of 51% to confirm justices now.. called the "nuclear option" instead of 60% as was previously the case.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/33462/possible-wrinkle-in-supreme-court</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 01:37:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/33462.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2017 07:39:45 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Possible wrinkle in Supreme Court on Sun, 11 Jun 2017 16:40:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/pppucci" aria-label="Profile: pppucci">@<bdi>pppucci</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/frederick" aria-label="Profile: Frederick">@<bdi>Frederick</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I have mentioned that there are 4 liberal, 4 conservative, and one swing Supreme Court Justices.<br />
Three of the liberals are quite elderly and could retire or die at any time.<br />
However, I just found out that the swing vote Kennedy who is 80 years old might retire within a month!</p>
<p dir="auto">That would probably result in 5 conservative vs 4 liberal justices. <br />
Thanks to moonbat Harry Reid - who didn't anticipate that the Republican's would take over all 3 branches of government, It only takes a simple majority of 51% to confirm justices now.. called the "nuclear option" instead of 60% as was previously the case.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">And surely some conservatives are trying to slip arsenic into Ruth Bader Ginsberg's cereal.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">You mean like the way they killed of perfectly healthy Scalia and didn't do the mandatory autopsy?</p>
<p dir="auto">Giving arsenic to that witch Ginsburg would do no good.  She thrives on poison.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.gaytor.rent/post/218879</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.gaytor.rent/post/218879</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frederick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2017 16:40:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Possible wrinkle in Supreme Court on Sun, 11 Jun 2017 15:26:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/frederick" aria-label="Profile: Frederick">@<bdi>Frederick</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I have mentioned that there are 4 liberal, 4 conservative, and one swing Supreme Court Justices.<br />
Three of the liberals are quite elderly and could retire or die at any time.<br />
However, I just found out that the swing vote Kennedy who is 80 years old might retire within a month!</p>
<p dir="auto">That would probably result in 5 conservative vs 4 liberal justices. <br />
Thanks to moonbat Harry Reid - who didn't anticipate that the Republican's would take over all 3 branches of government, It only takes a simple majority of 51% to confirm justices now.. called the "nuclear option" instead of 60% as was previously the case.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">And surely some conservatives are trying to slip arsenic into Ruth Bader Ginsberg's cereal.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.gaytor.rent/post/218877</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.gaytor.rent/post/218877</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[pppucci]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2017 15:26:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Possible wrinkle in Supreme Court on Sun, 11 Jun 2017 07:45:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I was gonna say THEY'RE ALL WRINKLED, but I won't.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.gaytor.rent/post/218840</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.gaytor.rent/post/218840</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[raphjd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2017 07:45:33 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>