Is the opposite of RIGHT "Left" or "Wrong"?
-
Although I'm not a liberal, it is possible to be liberal and be credible (believe it or not!)
However, these days, the problem isn't so much the liberals / democrats, it is the massive influx of libtards that just make things, up, twist them, and spew hateful, anti-Trump crap every day, ad nauseum!People can have differences of opinion and both sides have good points and credibility.. but that isn't happening.
Truth, accuracy, and fairness have been cast aside by the libtards. They will say and fabricate anything to try and undermine the government.I can concisely tell you what is going on:
In wars, when one side has lost, sometimes instead of surrendering, they do what is called "scorched earth" and destroy their own country rather than allow the winners to take it. This is exactly what the libtards are doing. Even though they might SAY that they accept that Trump won, they do NOT accept it. They do NOT want Trump to succeed at anything. The libtards and snowflakes would rather see the country fail than allow Trump to fix it.Mate
I am not sure the 1st 3 times I told you but I am telling you again.. left bash all you freaking want but PLEASE stop using the word libtard - it just makes you look like an ass
What word do you use to delineate liberals and democrats who act and behave like whining, malcontent, crazy, lying, delusional babies?
Call them "Modern Liberals" like Raph does - or use any generic term like "Capital L Liberal" or other stuff - point is if you have to insult people you do not know just to make a point then you have already lost
-
Although I'm not a liberal, it is possible to be liberal and be credible (believe it or not!)
However, these days, the problem isn't so much the liberals / democrats, it is the massive influx of libtards that just make things, up, twist them, and spew hateful, anti-Trump crap every day, ad nauseum!People can have differences of opinion and both sides have good points and credibility.. but that isn't happening.
Truth, accuracy, and fairness have been cast aside by the libtards. They will say and fabricate anything to try and undermine the government.I can concisely tell you what is going on:
In wars, when one side has lost, sometimes instead of surrendering, they do what is called "scorched earth" and destroy their own country rather than allow the winners to take it. This is exactly what the libtards are doing. Even though they might SAY that they accept that Trump won, they do NOT accept it. They do NOT want Trump to succeed at anything. The libtards and snowflakes would rather see the country fail than allow Trump to fix it.Mate
I am not sure the 1st 3 times I told you but I am telling you again.. left bash all you freaking want but PLEASE stop using the word libtard - it just makes you look like an ass
What word do you use to delineate liberals and democrats who act and behave like whining, malcontent, crazy, lying, delusional babies?
Call them "Modern Liberals" like Raph does - or use any generic term like "Capital L Liberal" or other stuff - point is if you have to insult people you do not know just to make a point then you have already lost
It's very frustrating. I'd appreciate having an honest political discussion especially from an international perspective but so much of the rhetoric here is toxic and very difficult to cut through. To your point, Frederick's instant jump to using the term libtard removes any credibility his argument has.
-
He's making a distinction between liberal and libtard. Personally, I use classic liberal and modern liberal.
Modern liberals think the person (George "The Animal" Steele) in the picture is a 6yo black girl, so she should be allowed to join their Brownies troupe.
Dude, I'm gonna do you a huge favor and forward this forum post to my psychiatrist. You probably need it way more than I ever did. Because this is goddamn batshit insanity.
Umm, I'm the one fighting against the liberal insanity. It's the liberals who are fighting so that people can pretend to be whatever they want.
-
He's making a distinction between liberal and libtard. Personally, I use classic liberal and modern liberal.
Modern liberals think the person (George "The Animal" Steele) in the picture is a 6yo black girl, so she should be allowed to join their Brownies troupe.
Dude, I'm gonna do you a huge favor and forward this forum post to my psychiatrist. You probably need it way more than I ever did. Because this is goddamn batshit insanity.
Umm, I'm the one fighting against the liberal insanity. It's the liberals who are fighting so that people can pretend to be whatever they want.
That's what Don Quixote said. It did not make him any less insane. Stop blaiming it on the windmills.
And we all know you are not gay- you are just pretending to be. See what I did there? -
Modern liberals are the insane fucks.
Sane people understand that being a girl who's a trans guy who identifies as a girl is just a GIRL.
Sane people realize that wearing eye shadow does not make you trans.
Sane people realize that wearing your grandma's clip-on earrings makes you trans.
Sane people realize that putting glitter in your hair and tying tampons into your beard does not make you trans.
Sane people realize that simply wearing boys' underwear does not make you trans.
Modern liberals don't get any of this, therefore they are the insane fucks.
-
Modern liberals are the insane fucks.
Sane people understand that being a girl who's a trans guy who identifies as a girl is just a GIRL.
Sane people realize that wearing eye shadow does not make you trans.
Sane people realize that wearing your grandma's clip-on earrings makes you trans.
Sane people realize that putting glitter in your hair and tying tampons into your beard does not make you trans.
Sane people realize that simply wearing boys' underwear does not make you trans.
Modern liberals don't get any of this, therefore they are the insane fucks.
Alright, without hyperbole and rhetoric, can you explain why this issue is such a big deal for you?
-
LOL, those are real cases which I've talked about before.
Why is it important? Because you people are demanding that speech you don't like be criminalized. Not only that, you think it's great to set buildings on fire with people in them, to prevent them from saying something you might disagree with.
-
LOL, those are real cases which I've talked about before.
Why is it important? Because you people are demanding that speech you don't like be criminalized. Not only that, you think it's great to set buildings on fire with people in them, to prevent them from saying something you might disagree with.
Wow, I didn't want to log in and post but I see you posting in almost every topic with the same incendiary and hyperbolic rhetoric over and over. The world is changing and I know it's scary, but you don't need to tear down everyone around you in the process. Step away from the "news" and take a deep breath. You're fighting against the very people that fought for the rights you enjoy today.
-
Modern liberals are the insane fucks.
Sane people understand that being a girl who's a trans guy who identifies as a girl is just a GIRL.
Sane people realize that wearing eye shadow does not make you trans.
Sane people realize that wearing your grandma's clip-on earrings makes you trans.
Sane people realize that putting glitter in your hair and tying tampons into your beard does not make you trans.
Sane people realize that simply wearing boys' underwear does not make you trans.
Modern liberals don't get any of this, therefore they are the insane fucks.Sane people realize that men should be with women, and women should be with men.
Sane people realize that having sex with men does not make you a woman.
Sane people know a cock goes in a pussy, not an ass.
Sane people realize that god made you a straight man, you only pretend you are gay.See how that works?
Bigots like to say all kinds of things about how other people live their lives- bigots like you.
As a gay man, you should know that. Since you don't know that, that makes you a hypocrite.You do know that they used to lock us homosexuals up in mental hospitals, don't you?
Up untill the 1970's, gay people could be given electroshock therapy and even lobotomies.That is because SANE people are never homosexual.
If you don't get that, then you must be an insane fuck, right?
-
Why is it important? Because you people are demanding that speech you don't like be criminalized. Not only that, you think it's great to set buildings on fire with people in them, to prevent them from saying something you might disagree with.
SO, no reason at all then, since absolutely NOBODY is criminalizing speech they don't like, and the few times that is attempted, it is ALWAYS done by conservatives, by definition. Again- every single real incident of attempts to criminalize free speech has been done by conservatives.
A university saying you can't speak here is NOT criminalizing- it is denying a platform.
Like, for example, Donald Trump trying to override the Bill of Rights so he can sue the press for saying true things about him that are not flattering. That is criminalizing.
And, again, when people set fire to buildings with people in them they are sociopaths.
For you to associate that behavior with any political ideology makes you either incredibly stupid, or insane, or both. -
Why is it important? Because you people are demanding that speech you don't like be criminalized. Not only that, you think it's great to set buildings on fire with people in them, to prevent them from saying something you might disagree with.
SO, no reason at all then, since absolutely NOBODY is criminalizing speech they don't like, and the few times that is attempted, it is ALWAYS done by conservatives, by definition. Again- every single real incident of attempts to criminalize free speech has been done by conservatives.
A university saying you can't speak here is NOT criminalizing- it is denying a platform.
Like, for example, Donald Trump trying to override the Bill of Rights so he can sue the press for saying true things about him that are not flattering. That is criminalizing.
And, again, when people set fire to buildings with people in them they are sociopaths.
For you to associate that behavior with any political ideology makes you either incredibly stupid, or insane, or both.Uh.. what TRUE THINGS are the press saying about Trump that are not flattering? Seems to me that all the unflattering remarks are fake news.
-
Why is it important? Because you people are demanding that speech you don't like be criminalized. Not only that, you think it's great to set buildings on fire with people in them, to prevent them from saying something you might disagree with.
SO, no reason at all then, since absolutely NOBODY is criminalizing speech they don't like, and the few times that is attempted, it is ALWAYS done by conservatives, by definition. Again- every single real incident of attempts to criminalize free speech has been done by conservatives.
A university saying you can't speak here is NOT criminalizing- it is denying a platform.
Like, for example, Donald Trump trying to override the Bill of Rights so he can sue the press for saying true things about him that are not flattering. That is criminalizing.
And, again, when people set fire to buildings with people in them they are sociopaths.
For you to associate that behavior with any political ideology makes you either incredibly stupid, or insane, or both.Uh.. what TRUE THINGS are the press saying about Trump that are not flattering? Seems to me that all the unflattering remarks are fake news.
Are you KIDDING ME?
Oh, yeah- you are the one who thinks every single news source on the planet except FOX and Breitbart are all "Fake news".Tell me- why should I go through the effort of posting a ton of links for you when you will ignore them all?
-
Yeah, and you think TYT and Clinton News Network are the only real news.
-
"Sane", probably.
-
I don't know about you other LIBTARD's out there, but im proud to be one.
Calling me one doesn't bother me in the least, it just highlights the 'rights" modus operandus of calling people names and screaming the loudest.
Am i the only one that finds it a tad obsurd that an admin/moderator of a gay porn site is on the side of a party that is against his very freedom to be a moderator of this site? :police: -
Yeah, and you think TYT and Clinton News Network are the only real news.
And you probably think InfoWars is real news. :laugh:
-
In the book, "Fire in the Minds of Men," written by the Librarian of Congress, James Billington, he explains that the term "Left" originated in France, when the secularists rose against the patriarchy and the divine right to rule of Kings, creating the Socialist Revolutionary Faith, a few hundred years ago. They were considered "left" in relation to the "left hand path," i.e. EVIL, and atheist.
-
In the book, "Fire in the Minds of Men," written by the Librarian of Congress, James Billington, he explains that the term "Left" originated in France, when the secularists rose against the patriarchy and the divine right to rule of Kings, creating the Socialist Revolutionary Faith, a few hundred years ago. They were considered "left" in relation to the "left hand path," i.e. EVIL, and atheist.
So people on the "right" are religious zealots? Okay.
-
Not necessarily religious, or zealot, you cannot tie the two together - that's stereotyping. This is merely the etymology from hundreds of years ago and things change, but to a basic degree, those who most likely believe in a creator and "In God We Trust," and "All men are endowed by their creator," kinda stuff.
-
In fact, back in those days, I probably would have been somewhat leftist myself, asking the King and the Pope, who said that you were ROYAL? Who gave you DIVINE authority? It was that kind of thinking that led to the Protestant Reformation and the founding of America - the American Revolution. It wasn't until the Communists of Russia and the Socialists of Germany and the Italian Socialist Dictatorship and the Chinese idea of Communism came around with the Secularist Revolutionary Ideology full blast, that was responsible for the mass slaughter of hundreds of millions.
The American Revolution was different, although there was the trail of tears and slavery which was promulgated through the Democratic Party, and although America didn't start slavery, we ended it. More specifically, the Republicans did. And now the Pope and the DNC are totally communist. The Pope even warned recently about Libertarians, when in fact, Libertarian means "those who believe in Free Will." Hmm, something to think about. Free Will is a Biblical concept, and he's supposed to be the Representative of God? A Communist Pedophile Leader? I don't think so. Communism, regardless of whether it fought against the evils of the Royal Blue Bloods, has never been good for the world, and it never will, because regardless of what kind of socialism it is, you always have the ones at the top distributing the goods, while keeping the lion's share. Hillary wants Socialism, Obama wants Socialism, Bernie wants Socialism, the Pope wants Socialism, all so they can have power.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login