Do you smoke crack, sniff glue, or both? 
I have tried to think of some way to engage your asinine, false comments, but there is no meat on the bone to chew on.

I'm curious if now that everyone, literally everyone, has confirmed the story of Trump giving Israeli intelligence to Russia, if you are still going to stick by your claim that it is "fake news?"

I don't suppose that Hillary instructing some private company with no security clearance to access and delete at least 30,000 e-mails, which were property of the U.S. government, AFTER being ordered by Congress to turn them over, is obstruction of justice? nooo….

Ohhhhh!  Now I get it!  You want Trump to just do the same things that Hillary did.

@royalcrown89:

They live in an alternative reality where she actually did win and is facing impeachment  :crazy2:

Well, when a Trump supporter is confronted with something Trump did, the normal recourse is "HILLARY CLINTON!" because that worked in the election. Which ignores that in the span of a few months Trump has ruled with a degree of corruption and incompetence that makes litterally anything Clinton has ever even been accused of seem like motes of dust.

"But Clinton's emails!"
"Trump outed an operative working in ISIS controlled territory."

"But the Clinton Foundation!"
"Russia's state owned bank is funding Trump's buildings and China has given millions to his son-in-law…"

It just goes on and on and on...

Do you smoke crack, sniff glue, or both? 
I have tried to think of some way to engage your asinine, false comments, but there is no meat on the bone to chew on.

They live in an alternative reality where she actually did win and is facing impeachment  :crazy2:

Well, when a Trump supporter is confronted with something Trump did, the normal recourse is "HILLARY CLINTON!" because that worked in the election. Which ignores that in the span of a few months Trump has ruled with a degree of corruption and incompetence that makes litterally anything Clinton has ever even been accused of seem like motes of dust.

"But Clinton's emails!"
"Trump outed an operative working in ISIS controlled territory."

"But the Clinton Foundation!"
"Russia's state owned bank is funding Trump's buildings and China has given millions to his son-in-law…"

It just goes on and on and on...

If she was elected and had actually done something wrong, then an independent party, such as a special prosecutor would have needed to look into it, possibly with the result of impeachment.
However, I remind you, she's not in any position, she's not the president!

They live in an alternative reality where she actually did win and is facing impeachment  :crazy2:

I don't suppose that Hillary instructing some private company with no security clearance to access and delete at least 30,000 e-mails, which were property of the U.S. government, AFTER being ordered by Congress to turn them over, is obstruction of justice? nooo….

She's not the goddamned president! WHAT THE FUCK DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH HILLARY? SHE'S NOT THE LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD! THE GODDAMNED PRESIDENT SHOULD BE HELD TO A HIGHER STANDARD THAN A GRANDMOTHER WALKING IN A FUCKING FOREST!

If she was elected and had actually done something wrong, then an independent party, such as a special prosecutor would have needed to look into it, possibly with the result of impeachment.
However, I remind you, she's not in any position, she's not the president!

Dude, I don't want to be rude, but I could only read one sentence before I realized that you don't understand. Donald Trump is NOT a Republican or a Democrat. Party Lines are OFF the table. It has nothing to do with it. They are ONE party of evil, and Trump is the only one who is an outside force strong enough to eviscerate parties.

Yep, someone with a 32-38% approval rating has the power to eviscerate the parties. Someone who got 46.1% of the vote, not even the 53%(2008) or 51% (2012) that Obama got when he ran, but 46.1% of the vote. And are you saying he has a strong outside force just because 77,000 individuals spread across Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan were enough votes to sway enough precincts in those states? Yeah good luck with that  :crazy2:

Not if they want to be re-elected. We voted for Trump. But we more importantly voted for his positions and ideals. We will not vote those bastards in again.

Are you sure going down that rabbit hole will be worth it? If you guys try to vote out longtime Congressmen, those incumbents will most likely run third party and split that side of the vote, possibly causing a Democratic win in some districts. Candidate Agent Orange was more unpopular than Hillary and he won because so many people on the left sat it out. People may have sat it out or voted for Jill Stein or a dead gorilla, but those same people did not want Agent Orange which is why they did not vote for him. We haven't had a president this unpopular this early in his presidency in recent history going back over fifty years. It doesn't matter what YOU voted for, the majority of the country did not want THIS and we're seeing that now with the strong resistance to now #45.

More PROPAGANDA!!! YOU ARE LYING. There are NO Republicans calling for this.

I'm sure behind closed doors they are. And many will publicly soon.

@Frederick:

This is what is called "fake news".   You just make shit up and post it.

You are not doing yourself any favors by claiming a story that has been verified by Trump himself, as well as members of Israeli intelligence is "fake news."

Things aren't looking too good for #45 right now so his supporters are calling anything that is verified (including by Agent Orange himself) fake news  :crazy2: Don't worry, their time is running out.

This is what is called "fake news".   You just make shit up and post it.

You are not doing yourself any favors by claiming a story that has been verified by Trump himself, as well as members of Israeli intelligence is "fake news."

@Frederick:

I don't suppose that Hillary instructing some private company with no security clearance to access and delete at least 30,000 e-mails, which were property of the U.S. government, AFTER being ordered by Congress to turn them over, is obstruction of justice? nooo….

Yeah. It isn't believable that anyone cares about any of this when Trump compromised the identity of American operatives in the Middle East when he divulged information of the highest classification level to the Russians in an effort to brag to them. Try again.

This is what is called "fake news".  You just make shit up and post it.

@Frederick:

It was a witchhunt?  Hmm.. a witchhunt that thus far has failed to rid ourselves of that witch!
Hillary was ORDERED by Congress to turn over 30,000 emails that were the property of the U.S. Government which she had illegally had on her own private server in an insecure location (her house).   Instead, she went to a private tech company, with no security clearance, and had them access and DELETE those messages AFTER she was ordered to produce them!   She should have been put in JAIL then.. and should still be put in jail.   You are comparing MOUNTAINS to molehills.

No YOU are the one making a mountain out of this proven molehill of an email conspiracy. Again you are wrong wrong wrong. And the fact that she's NOT in jail is all the proof needed that it was a witch hunt! After all the months of crying "Lock her up!" And his campaign promise to indict and convict Hillary- Trump has (again) failed to live up to this campaign promise. Why? Because in the end the evidence needed to PROVE that she was guilty DOESN'T EXIST. She was exonerated and cleared by all the investigative commissions the Republicans could throw at her.

Knowing he will never have the proof he needs, Trump just let her go. Again, lying to all his supporters. Just like his claims of the nonexistent wiretap. Empty lies with nothing to back them up.  ::)

You are out of your mind in denial.

This has been another classic deflection attempt by the defenders of the New Swamp known as the Trump administration.

It was a witchhunt?  Hmm.. a witchhunt that thus far has failed to rid ourselves of that witch!
Hillary was ORDERED by Congress to turn over 30,000 emails that were the property of the U.S. Government which she had illegally had on her own private server in an insecure location (her house).   Instead, she went to a private tech company, with no security clearance, and had them access and DELETE those messages AFTER she was ordered to produce them!   She should have been put in JAIL then.. and should still be put in jail.   You are comparing MOUNTAINS to molehills.

No YOU are the one making a mountain out of this proven molehill of an email conspiracy. Again you are wrong wrong wrong. And the fact that she's NOT in jail is all the proof needed that it was a witch hunt! After all the months of crying "Lock her up!" And his campaign promise to indict and convict Hillary- Trump has (again) failed to live up to this campaign promise. Why? Because in the end the evidence needed to PROVE that she was guilty DOESN'T EXIST. She was exonerated and cleared by all the investigative commissions the Republicans could throw at her.

Knowing he will never have the proof he needs, Trump just let her go. Again, lying to all his supporters. Just like his claims of the nonexistent wiretap. Empty lies with nothing to back them up.  ::)

I don't suppose that Hillary instructing some private company with no security clearance to access and delete at least 30,000 e-mails, which were property of the U.S. government, AFTER being ordered by Congress to turn them over, is obstruction of justice? nooo….

The fact that her e-mails were investigated, and investigated, and investigated some more and the rabid GOPers couldn't find any evidence of actual wrong-doing means that there probably was no obstruction of justice. If the GOP had any legitimate excuse to convict of her a crime, she would already be convicted.

Beyond that, what Hillary did or didn't do has no bearing on Trump. She is not the POTUS and he is. He has to take responsibility for his own actions, apart from anything that Hillary may have done. For the sake of argument, let's say that Hillary is guilty of obstruction of justice. Does that mean that Trump isn't guilty of something because Hillary is? Certainly not.

It was a witchhunt?  Hmm.. a witchhunt that thus far has failed to rid ourselves of that witch!
Hillary was ORDERED by Congress to turn over 30,000 emails that were the property of the U.S. Government which she had illegally had on her own private server in an insecure location (her house).   Instead, she went to a private tech company, with no security clearance, and had them access and DELETE those messages AFTER she was ordered to produce them!   She should have been put in JAIL then.. and should still be put in jail.   You are comparing MOUNTAINS to molehills.

Why yes, that was my exact point. Trump just gave vital Israeli intelligence to Russia (Iran's ally), including outing an  operative in ISIS controlled territory… because he wanted to brag. That's a mountain so large it would dwarf Olympus Mons.

Compared to that anything about Clinton's IT management is not even a molehill, it's a quark it is so minor.

@Frederick:

I don't suppose that Hillary instructing some private company with no security clearance to access and delete at least 30,000 e-mails, which were property of the U.S. government, AFTER being ordered by Congress to turn them over, is obstruction of justice? nooo….

Happily, Hillary Clinton is not in power and will likely never get close to the presidency again.

Unhappily, we have an incompetent, mentally impaired rapist in the White House who is jeopardizing the safety of the country and our allies.

Mentally impaired rapist?  That is being a bit harsh on Bill Clinton.  Well, OK, Bill DID stick his cock in Monica Lewinsky's mouth, and got cum all over her dress, at a desk in the Oval Office… and also stuck a cigar up Monica's vagina..  and lied about it to his wife and to the American people and Congress (which is a felony).  But that is the only time Bill got NAILED.. he's done similar things hundreds if not thousands of times.