@Frederick:

I don't need to comment on this one.  Just click the link and read.

Xhttp://freebeacon.com/politics/five-old-tweets-came-back-haunt-chuck-schumer/  (remove the X to view it)

Trumps old tweets come back to haunt him all the time.  Even this week his euro trash hooker wife insulted Saudi Arabia by not wearing a head scarf.

I don't like Chuck Schumer either  though.  I wish someone else was the face of the Democratic party.

I can't think of anybody in Congress that I'm thrilled with, no matter what party.  Congressmen tend to be megalomaniac lawyers and hairbrained activists.  Most people are turned off by congressmen, which is why most presidents are former governors instead of congressmen. 
What's the opposite of PRO-gress?  CON-ress.

I do think that there should be term limits for congressmen.  Two 6 year terms or one 10 year term is plenty for any of them.

You are clearly delusional.

The last 2 labour governments REFUSED to give us marriage equality.

I'm not the one who kept denying which party voted for it and which party voted against it.

I don't need to comment on this one.  Just click the link and read.

Xhttp://freebeacon.com/politics/five-old-tweets-came-back-haunt-chuck-schumer/  (remove the X to view it)

Trumps old tweets come back to haunt him all the time.  Even this week his euro trash hooker wife insulted Saudi Arabia by not wearing a head scarf.

I don't like Chuck Schumer either  though.  I wish someone else was the face of the Democratic party.

The last 2 labour governments REFUSED to give us marriage equality.

So you are still refusing to admit that it was David Cameron's Tory/conservative government that put the bill forward.

Unlike Labour's whipped vote, the Tories were allowed to vote as they saw fit.

And they voted against it. Thank you for admitting that Labor gave the UK marriage equality and that the Conservatives opposed them.

Unlike Labour's whipped vote, the Tories were allowed to vote as they saw fit.

The UK did not get marriage equality through a private member's bill.    It was done through a government bill.

So again, which Prime Minister gave the UK marriage equality?!

I'll give you even more help.   It wasn't any fucking liberal government that did it.

Which party voted for it and which party voted against it?

So again, which Prime Minister gave the UK marriage equality?!

I'll give you even more help.  It wasn't any fucking liberal government that did it.

Please tell us the name of the UK Prime Minister that gave us marriage equality and the party he or she was the leader of.

I'll give you some help.

Tony Blair (Labour/liberals) gave us "separate but somewhat equal"  and said he saw no reason to go further with it.

Gordon Brown (Labour/liberals) said he agreed with Tony Blair, so he wan't going to move it further either

Now here's where you're on your own.   Tell us which one gave us true marriage equality.

Tell us which party voted for it and which party voted against it? This is pretty basic stuff, in a legislature (be it a parliament, a congress, a senate, a diet, an assembly) the legislators vote to pass laws. The majority either approves or disapproves the proposed legislation.

So…

Here's where you're on your own. Which party voted for it and which party voted against it?

@raphjd:

Still refusing to admit which party put the bill forward.    Typical liberal.

Liberals wouldn't give us marriage equality, so they get the credit for it.

Still refusing to admit who actually voted for the bill and who actually voted against it. Typical conservative.

Conservatives voted against the bill, so they get credit for it.

Please tell us the name of the UK Prime Minister that gave us marriage equality and the party he or she was the leader of.

I'll give you some help.

Tony Blair (Labour/liberals) gave us "separate but somewhat equal"  and said he saw no reason to go further with it.

Gordon Brown (Labour/liberals) said he agreed with Tony Blair, so he wan't going to move it further either

Now here's where you're on your own.  Tell us which one gave us true marriage equality.

Paid Russian trolls, the same ones that overran facebook and twitter.

This was from the (republican) Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/russian-trolls-fake-news_us_58dde6bae4b08194e3b8d5c4
https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/03/31/paid-russians-spread-anti-clinton-fake-news/22020336/
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2017/03/30/senate-hearing-focus-paid-internet-trolls-other-russia-tactics/Kt1FzM78kips9wnWnGRkeO/story.html

Still refusing to admit which party put the bill forward.    Typical liberal.

Liberals wouldn't give us marriage equality, so they get the credit for it.

Still refusing to admit who actually voted for the bill and who actually voted against it. Typical conservative.

Conservatives voted against the bill, so they get credit for it.

Liberals wouldn't give us marriage equality, so they get the credit for it.

Which government put it forward and which government said "separate, but somewhat similar" was enough.

Who voted for it and who voted against it?

It was still the conservative government that gave it to us.

Labour thought that we had enough equality with "separate, but somewhat equal" civil partnerships.

So the conservatives who voted by majority against it gave it to you, and labor who voted by overwhelming majority for it thought it wasn't necessary?

Is this really your thought process?

Labour thought that we had enough equality with "separate, but somewhat equal" civil partnerships.

In the UK, it was the conservatives that gave us marriage equality.    Liberals were happy with "separate but some what similar".

It was the liberal government of New Labour that constantly fought against equality in the courts.

Well someone forgot to tell the Labor MPs when they were voting on the bill. The Conservatives voted 127 to 117 against the bill, while Labor voted 194 to 14 for the bill.

In the UK, it was the conservatives that gave us marriage equality.    Liberals were happy with "separate but some what similar".

It was the liberal government of New Labour that constantly fought against equality in the courts.

The UK Conservative Party is very, very different from the conservative US Republican Party. I wouldn't be surprised if they have more in common with the US Democratic Party.

It was the liberal government of New Labour that constantly fought against equality in the courts.

What has left wing politics done for LBGTQ?

Everything. Literally every advancement of gay rights. Everything from the decriminalization of sodomy to the marriage equality. It was all left-wing politics, left-wing activism, left-wing political parties. The exact "libtards" you libel in your post.

@Frederick:

I would remind you that Hillary was 100% anti gay marriage until election time rolled around.

She also tenaciously used the state department to put pressure on nations with anti-LGBT laws, and started tying US aid to LGBT rights. She also reversed the Bush era policy of rejecting LGBT refugees. There are hundreds (if not thousands) of LGBT people alive today because of her.

@Frederick:

Also, there should be some sort of harassment laws prohibiting people from being questioned about their sexuality.  It bothers me whenever a celebrity is cross-examined about who they are dating, if they have any kids, if they are married, etc.   It really pissed me off that in offices I worked in, the straight people would drag their kids and wife in when applying for a job to squeeze more money out of the business owner.   And when a gay guy's boyfriend picked him up from work, that led to that guy being forced to quit a couple of months later.

Hey, remember how I said left-wing politics were responsible for everything? Well in places where those left-wing politics succeeded then that guy could have sued for discrimination. In places where the right-wing politics succeeded, he is shit out of luck.

I am shocked at the community here… recently signed up. Thought I would be part of an inclusive, kind, caring community, but all I am seem to be seeing is this shit... I don't understand the rationale. I understand there are going to be right-wing or "alt-right" LGBTQ but I don't understand why? What has right wing politics done for the LBTGQ?

"Alt-Right" has been redefined by the left to mean Nazi.  That's bullshit.

The alt-right has nothing to do with Nazi'ism.  It's about not being the traditional right.

SJWs of all stripes have caused a lot of people to turn their backs on the left.    I've named many of the freaks in previous threads so I'm not gonna do it here, but those people and their supporters are doing nothing but harming real LGBTIs.    Gender trenders, gender terrorists and all the other ass clown need to stop their shit and grow up.

Governments need to stop sucking their asses and be sensible when making laws.  NYC, Canada and others have passed laws that can destroy a business for a simple mistake due to the antics of people like Elliot Cope, Dakota and whatnot.

Governments are criminalizing speech, then talking about how they love free speech.

Liberals are setting fire to building, that have people in them, to prevent free speech from occurring.  This was at Berkeley, no less, the birthplace of college campus free speech.

Feminists cry about gender equality, but protest about equalizing the state pension age in the UK.  They also fought 3 times in the last 14 years to prevent the UK from making sex crime laws gender neutral.    Similar things in other countries.