Pepsi cucks to BLM
-
Hurting the cuck's feelings. Poor lil cuck and his poor lil feelings. You throw words around like cuck and sjw using them as insults and then run to your cave when someone throws them back at you. Cliche. Stereotype. Boring.
Man, I really regret stumbling into the political forum in a gay porn torrent site.
Spam - personal attacks. -
Hurting the cuck's feelings. Poor lil cuck and his poor lil feelings. You throw words around like cuck and sjw using them as insults and then run to your cave when someone throws them back at you. Cliche. Stereotype. Boring.
Man, I really regret stumbling into the political forum in a gay porn torrent site.
I believe he's trying too hard to be right-wing. You can be gay and right-wing without completely losing your rationale. He has obviously lost his rationale and has gone off into a highly irrational tangent where you either hate yourself and agree 100% with him or you are a SJW. I actually empathized with him about one of his current situations because unlike him, I can show empathy towards someone even if I cannot relate to them politically, socially, economically, etc. I truly believe he does not know reality from fiction at this point.
-
:police: Jumping into a thread for the sole purpose of attacking a person is not allowed.
The above has alway been the rule. It adds no value to the thread. :police:
And again, SJWs have no actual response to my comments, so they have to attack me personally.
-
I used to laugh at people who were deemed "SJW" but quickly realized that the entire anti-SJW movement was co-opted by racists and alt-righters. They claim to be against modern feminism and BLM, but really they are just against women and black people. It has got to the point were anyone who uses the term "cuck" and "SJW" is likely a terrible human being.
The same can be said for your side.
Your side set a building on fire to prevent "wrong think". You guys gloated that it was set on fire with people in it.
Your side says it's ok to beat the shit out of people even after they are laying, unconscious and bleeding in the street.
It's your side that says "just believe" and to throw men in prison for rape solely on a woman's say so.
It's your side that did $15,000 worth of damage to a frat house based on a complete lie and non of you said sorry or helped pay for the damage.
It's your side that thinks it's ok to set a girl's hair on fire because she doesn't agree with you.
It's ok to pour a bottle of piss on a reporter's head because she asked questions you didn't have answers for.
It's ok for a man to hit a woman for disagreeing with feminism.
It's ok to false flag at every turn to create "hate crimes" that never happened.
Yeah, who's really the bad side?
"It's ok for a man to hit a woman for disagreeing with feminism. "
no.. but the domestic violence that occurs on a daily basis, where men are hurting women is ok? you ok with that? Because it sounds like to me you are pointing to 1 off or minority things, that are bad but are done by silly extremists.. i'm sorry but both sides have stories like this they could tell all day
e.g.
"It's ok to false flag at every turn to create "hate crimes" that never happened"
but what of the vast majority that DID happen? Are they ok? no, they are not. Who did those ? Who knows?
look at both sides - there are extreme 1 off things on both sides..
That is your full reply (post #47 in this thread).
Please be kind enough to show me where I misquoted you.
That post shows that you gendered domestic violence. You did not say "spouses".
-
I used to laugh at people who were deemed "SJW" but quickly realized that the entire anti-SJW movement was co-opted by racists and alt-righters. They claim to be against modern feminism and BLM, but really they are just against women and black people. It has got to the point were anyone who uses the term "cuck" and "SJW" is likely a terrible human being.
The same can be said for your side.
Your side set a building on fire to prevent "wrong think". You guys gloated that it was set on fire with people in it.
Your side says it's ok to beat the shit out of people even after they are laying, unconscious and bleeding in the street.
It's your side that says "just believe" and to throw men in prison for rape solely on a woman's say so.
It's your side that did $15,000 worth of damage to a frat house based on a complete lie and non of you said sorry or helped pay for the damage.
It's your side that thinks it's ok to set a girl's hair on fire because she doesn't agree with you.
It's ok to pour a bottle of piss on a reporter's head because she asked questions you didn't have answers for.
It's ok for a man to hit a woman for disagreeing with feminism.
It's ok to false flag at every turn to create "hate crimes" that never happened.
Yeah, who's really the bad side?
"It's ok for a man to hit a woman for disagreeing with feminism. "
no.. but the domestic violence that occurs on a daily basis, where men are hurting women is ok? you ok with that? Because it sounds like to me you are pointing to 1 off or minority things, that are bad but are done by silly extremists.. i'm sorry but both sides have stories like this they could tell all day
e.g.
"It's ok to false flag at every turn to create "hate crimes" that never happened"
but what of the vast majority that DID happen? Are they ok? no, they are not. Who did those ? Who knows?
look at both sides - there are extreme 1 off things on both sides..
That is your full reply (post #47 in this thread).
Please be kind enough to show me where I misquoted you.
That post shows that you gendered domestic violence. You did not say "spouses".
if i do will it matter ?
no.. because you twist things & have no intention of ever listening..
As I said it was in response to your comment re: violence - you said a few men get hit and i said so that discounts women?? THAT was my point - I have said to you 100x - it was IN CONTEXT
I stated many times that I said spouses to Fred's comment, not yours, which shows I understand it is a two way street - not sure what else to do except say - I proved my point and get over it
-
:police: Jumping into a thread for the sole purpose of attacking a person is not allowed.
The above has alway been the rule. It adds no value to the thread. :police:
And again, SJWs have no actual response to my comments, so they have to attack me personally.
***********response deleted prefer to stay unmuted lol
-
You seriously need to go back and re-read that exchange, because you have no idea what was said.
I talked about a male feminist punching a woman who disagreed with feminism (and other things). To which, you brought up domestic violence and men beating up women.
-
You seriously need to go back and re-read that exchange, because you have no idea what was said.
I talked about a male feminist punching a woman who disagreed with feminism (and other things). To which, you brought up domestic violence and men beating up women.
I was responding to you re : another point
anyway - I misinterpreted what you thought I was responding to or I would have cleared that up ages ago
point being is I am well aware that abuse happens to all not just women.. and that's all that matters
-
Hurting the cuck's feelings. Poor lil cuck and his poor lil feelings. You throw words around like cuck and sjw using them as insults and then run to your cave when someone throws them back at you. Cliche. Stereotype. Boring.
Man, I really regret stumbling into the political forum in a gay porn torrent site.
I believe he's trying too hard to be right-wing. You can be gay and right-wing without completely losing your rationale. He has obviously lost his rationale and has gone off into a highly irrational tangent where you either hate yourself and agree 100% with him or you are a SJW. I actually empathized with him about one of his current situations because unlike him, I can show empathy towards someone even if I cannot relate to them politically, socially, economically, etc. I truly believe he does not know reality from fiction at this point.
How is screaming "racist" at me because I brought up 2 proven lies by a Congressman, "rational"?! You could not see past race to rationally continue that discussion.
I'm not sure if you are a blatant liar or just completely delusional. Hating feminism has nothing to do with hating women and equality. I have shown countless reasons why I hate feminism, but instead of discussing those, you and your ilk scream "woman hater".
As an example, pointing out that feminists in the UK fought to prevent equalizing the state retirement age and making sex crime laws gender neutral, makes me a woman hater in your mind. I want equality in the state retirement age and sex crime laws.
So who is the real irrational one?
-
:police: Jumping into a thread for the sole purpose of attacking a person is not allowed.
The above has alway been the rule. It adds no value to the thread. :police:
And again, SJWs have no actual response to my comments, so they have to attack me personally.
***********response deleted prefer to stay unmuted lol
Since you reported me to me, I'll respond here.
Jumping into a thread just to flame is never allowed.
I have punished more people on "my side" than i have from "your side". You would know that if you paid attention.
RoyalCrown should have been punished for a very clear rule violation, but he admitted he was wrong in how he said it, not what he said. That's fine.
The 2 people from your side that have been punished were done so because they jumped into threads for the sole purpose to flame, not join in the discussions. The 1st one to get muted is already unmuted.
There was a 3rd person your side who was given a total site ban, but that was about a lot of other things. We got 50 to 100 complaints about him from users and staff per week.
-
had a strong feeling it was you it would go to - maybe they should change your title to moderator then? Because I assumed you were not a mod (not attacking just saying that your "role" is listed as an admin)
Anyway, point taken.. and thanks for clearing things up, i get how it goes now.
-
:fight: Daamn- gone for just a day or so and look what I missed! :afraid2:
Just to go back to the original topic- I guess having gotten a glimpse behind the scenes at the process of getting advertising approved- one of my friends writes for an ad agency- I think the Pepsi ad was a stunning example of nothing more than tone-deaf advertising which offered the ridiculous message that sharing a Pepsi with riot police will result in cheering crowds and everyone coming home as one big happy family.
The intent was well meaning- but the execution was absolutely terrible. And it has nothing to do with SJW or BLM or whatever cucking you want to call it- people rejected it because it was naive at best, and absolutely clueless at worst.
-
I guess nobody remember's the infamous Coke commercial against the Vietnam war. It was about peace, harmony and love.
If that commercial played today, the SJWs would have it removed as well.
-
I guess nobody remember's the infamous Coke commercial against the Vietnam war. It was about peace, harmony and love.
If that commercial played today, the SJWs would have it removed as well.
I was thinking about that commercial (apple trees, turtledoves, etc.)
One could argue that what defeated the American Indians was not guns, but booze. American Indians are extremely susceptible to the effects and addiction of alcohol. Once the Europeans began supplying them with booze, and showing them how to make it.. that spelled the doom for American Indians. Likewise in Vietnam.. the drug use was out of control. Readily available marijuana / hashish, opium / heroin, etc. not to mention a very high rate of suicides and fragging (killing off one's own officers to avoid conflicts). So much for peace and harmony! -
I guess nobody remember's the infamous Coke commercial against the Vietnam war. It was about peace, harmony and love.
If that commercial played today, the SJWs would have it removed as well.
wonder what their thoughts might be on the Madonna commercial with a black Jesus and burning crosses and stigmata?
-
The overwhelming majority of raphjd's opinions are wholly irrational based on wild generalizations.
LOl, so says the person that screams RACISM any time a white person disagree with black people no matter the topic.
And with that wholly irrational wild generalization you proved him right.
You are a liar and you know it. I hate feminism, not women and equality. I have pointed out a countless examples of ways feminists fight against equality.
Then they are NOT feminists.
-
The ad is just boring and the concept is old and tiresome. But what really killed it was the inclusion of that Kardashian Jenner girl. I strongly dislike her and her family.
If that's the best they got then they should just reuse Sofia Vergara's ads. At least they were entertaining. -
As I said it was in response to your comment re: violence - you said a few men get hit and i said so that discounts women?? THAT was my point - I have said to you 100x - it was IN CONTEXT
_As a gay man who was physically and emotionally abused by his male partner for many years, I want to say I wish when it comes to domestic violence that raphjd would just shut the fuck-up with his utterly willful-Ignorance and Stupidity on this subject.
But he obviously lacks the empathy to do so.
And NO, I will not discuss this further._
. . .
-
If raphjd would just shut the fuck-up with his utterly willful-Ignorance and Stupidity, he would have nothing left to say. ;D
-
The overwhelming majority of raphjd's opinions are wholly irrational based on wild generalizations.
LOl, so says the person that screams RACISM any time a white person disagree with black people no matter the topic.
And with that wholly irrational wild generalization you proved him right.
You are a liar and you know it. I hate feminism, not women and equality. I have pointed out a countless examples of ways feminists fight against equality.
Then they are NOT feminists.
What a tiresome laugh.
No True Scotsman fallacy.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login