<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Is religion really applicable these days]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">does religion have a leg to stand on in the modern age, surely we've moved on and can claim to be more aspiritual?</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/30545/is-religion-really-applicable-these-days</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 14:24:03 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/30545.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:16:24 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Is religion really applicable these days on Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:10:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">As much I hate to say it, yes.</p>
<p dir="auto">We're (almost?) at that point where scientific models have replaced theological ones, but as Marx has said, "Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people".</p>
<p dir="auto">PS. All science does is describe shit, not give the world meaning. I dunno, I'm not smart enough for this shit.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.gaytor.rent/post/204068</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.gaytor.rent/post/204068</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[famousbovine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:10:21 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>