@raphjd:

Liberals do themselves no favors by constant flaming of anyone who they deem "wrong think/speak".    They can't discuss whatever topic it is, they just do personal attacks.   If it's in person, then liberals get extremely violent.

Raphjd, I never flamed or personally attacked anyone. Meanwhile, jojojojo3 calls me "shit" and "stupid butt slutt." This is a clear violation of your own rules against name calling.

As hmmfer mentions, this entire thread was created to stigmatize and attack liberals.

In the future, please use the REPORT button on the specific post so I can find it/them.

I disagree about calling you "shit".  He was comparing you to Santorum, whom he said is shit.  He was saying you both are equally intolerant, just on opposite sides.

I do agree with about "stupid butt slut".  That is uncalled for and he was given a warning for that.

As for this thread, it may be about insulting liberals, but look how many we have that are nothing more than flaming non liberals.  We have one thread that says that anyone who is a conservative (more like anyone who isn't far left) is a racist because of guilt by association.

Liberals do themselves no favors by constant flaming of anyone who they deem "wrong think/speak".    They can't discuss whatever topic it is, they just do personal attacks.   If it's in person, then liberals get extremely violent.

Raphjd, I never flamed or personally attacked anyone. Meanwhile, jojojojo3 calls me "shit" and "stupid butt slutt." This is a clear violation of your own rules against name calling.

As hmmfer mentions, this entire thread was created to stigmatize and attack liberals.

@inkball:

Rick Santorum is a rabidly antigay politician who compared gay sex to bestiality. Michael Savage has described gay parents as child abusers. These are the men you approvingly cite.

I'm sickened by the posts I'm seeing in this forum. I'm seriously wondering of the worship of antigay bigots and of racism is part of some kind of gay nazi fetish I'm not aware of. If it is, let me know, so I won't waste my time responding to this rubbish.

so if you're not taking it seriously. i guess you shouldn't be taken seriously?

i mean it's not like trump held up a gay flag and said he supported the LGBT population of this country and was proud he could say it and the Republican National convention.

Oh wait that did happen. but that's conveniently ignored by you. sure Santorum is a shit but you're one in the same. you don't think your shit stinks or the fact that hillary ran her 08 campaign not on gay rights. only Edwards did and he lost in his own primaries.

but hey, be a stupid butt slutt for a political ideology. show us all how horseshoe theory is real and that you're the same as santorum with how intolerant you are.

Trump claimed to support the LGBT community, then he promptly reversed Obama-era school protections for vulnerable LGBT students once he got into in power. Betsy DeVos, Trump's education secretary, financially backs exgay groups that practice conversion therapy. Jeff Sessions, Trump's attorney general, supports amending the constitution to strip gay people of marriage rights. Rick Perry, another Trump cabinet member, compare being gay to alcoholism. Trump's supreme court pick compared gay marriage to incest, bigamy, and prostitution. When Mike Pence was governor of Indiana he created an HIV outbreak in that state and voted for every anti-LGBT piece of legislation that crossed his desk. These are just a few members of Trump's inner circle who are rabidly anti-gay.

If you prefer shallow pandering over substantive pro-LGBT policy, that's your business. But not all of us are willing to be fooled by an incompetent demagogue.

so if you're not taking it seriously. i guess you shouldn't be taken seriously?

i mean it's not like trump held up a gay flag and said he supported the LGBT population of this country and was proud he could say it and the Republican National convention.

Oh wait that did happen. but that's conveniently ignored by you. sure Santorum is a shit but you're one in the same. you don't think your shit stinks or the fact that hillary ran her 08 campaign not on gay rights. only Edwards did and he lost in his own primaries.

but hey, be a stupid butt slutt for a political ideology. show us all how horseshoe theory is real and that you're the same as santorum with how intolerant you are.

Holding a flag upside down is a sign of distress. Writing on a flag is disrespectful.

Words from the liars mouth are always self gratifying lies.

Liberals didn't ignore this act by Trump- they saw through it.

@raphjd:

Liberals do themselves no favors by constant flaming of anyone who they deem "wrong think/speak".    They can't discuss whatever topic it is, they just do personal attacks.  If it's in person, then liberals get extremely violent.

I think it's funny how liberals on YouTube got butt hurt over liberal videos getting banned for actual violations, after years of liberals doing false DMCAs against those they didn't like.

This thread is a "flaming" topic. The very title is an attack on liberals.

The irony of your argument is offset by your blind hypocrisy.

And on assuming people who hate seeing this bullshit on a PORN SITE are of the gay hive mind: Seeing politics before I even logged in today was more of a turnoff than anything. Congrats on ruining why so many of us come here.

I think it's funny how liberals on YouTube got butt hurt over liberal videos getting banned for actual violations, after years of liberals doing false DMCAs against those they didn't like.

Rick Santorum is a rabidly antigay politician who compared gay sex to bestiality. Michael Savage has described gay parents as child abusers. These are the men you approvingly cite.

I'm sickened by the posts I'm seeing in this forum. I'm seriously wondering of the worship of antigay bigots and of racism is part of some kind of gay nazi fetish I'm not aware of. If it is, let me know, so I won't waste my time responding to this rubbish.

so if you're not taking it seriously. i guess you shouldn't be taken seriously?

i mean it's not like trump held up a gay flag and said he supported the LGBT population of this country and was proud he could say it and the Republican National convention.

Oh wait that did happen. but that's conveniently ignored by you. sure Santorum is a shit but you're one in the same. you don't think your shit stinks or the fact that hillary ran her 08 campaign not on gay rights. only Edwards did and he lost in his own primaries.

but hey, be a stupid butt slutt for a political ideology. show us all how horseshoe theory is real and that you're the same as santorum with how intolerant you are.
 flaming

There are so many logical flaws with this pathetic excuse for an argument that it would be too time-consuming to point them all out. It's more like the whole article – and any referenced media -- is laughably flimsy and a sad attempt to be inflammatory for clickbait. Try again. Or better yet, don't.

no this is you trying to sound clever when you're not… but being too lazy to even do that.

In reality, real psychologists have weighed in on this topic.

In reality, most psychologists are liberals.  They are gonna make themselves look better, not worse.

@tempbo:

HOW IS THIS NOT FLAMING? The forums on this site are ridiculous. It's a real turnoff, makes me want to just use the other gay torrent sites & ditch this one. Too bad with 3/4 of a million users a few can make it distasteful for everyone else.

Are you advocating for the gay hive mind?

He never said anything of the sort.. at all

this thread is pure flaming in its language and tone but you  ignoring it, because you agree.. does not make it "ok"

and generalising about people's mental illnesses is downright disgusting.. and has nothing to do with politics.. so well done to the 2 0r 3 that are allowed to blindly carry on like it is just an "opinion"

In this "complaint" about liberalism, there is no actual complaint about liberalism.
There is only childish accusations, such as pretending that liberals engage in violence, when in reality conservatives have a MUCH higher tendancy towards violence.

Are you using the NO TRUE SCOTSMAN fallacy?

Maybe you are denying the violence actually happened.

Google Smugglypuff  , I think I spelled that right.  She false flagged her high school with homophobic graffiti.  She goes to college and  punches a reporter on camera, then she attacks an elderly couple who's only guilt is walking their dog, because she thought they anti-trans because of their age.

Berkeley has some pretty nasty incidents against people suspected, no evidence needed, of being wrong thinkers.

Pouring a bottle of piss on a reporter because she's questioning someone about the limitless Twitter genders, is "non violence", I guess.

Pepper spraying a girl (person, for the feminists) for without knowing what she's saying because she might be wrong speaking, isn't violence either.

Beating 3 guys, who did nothing wrong but might be wrong thinkers, until and even after they are unconscious.  Again, not violence.

4 blacks kidnapped, torture and racially abuse a mentally challenged white guy.  CNN's usual suspects (Don Lemon, Symone Sanders, et) massively downplayed the entire incident, but we all know what they would be saying if the races were reversed.

About 7 blacks beat up and steal a white guy's car because they say he's a Trump supporter.  Symone Sanders responded to this by saying; "Ah, poor, poor white people".

We do have proof a fake hate crimes, by the left.  One of the fake hate crimes was a muslim girl out whoring so she claimed to be abuse white a group of white guys so her dad wouldn't get pissed off at her for being out so late.  The muslim woman with the graffitied car is show on CCTV doing it herself.   The black girls on the bus started the fight with the white people, not the other way around as claimed. CCTV again proved this.  The black church was burnt down by one of it's black parishioners.  The Jewish college girl was writing hate messages on her white board.  Oddly enough, even though she was doing it to herself, the university has banned them so people can't do it to other people.  Milo has a video where he talks about several cases of lesbians faking hate crimes.  We've had gay guys doing it too.

Even TYT agrees that false flagging is always bad because it harms real victims.

HOW IS THIS NOT FLAMING? The forums on this site are ridiculous. It's a real turnoff, makes me want to just use the other gay torrent sites & ditch this one. Too bad with 3/4 of a million users a few can make it distasteful for everyone else.

Are you advocating for the gay hive mind?

Analyses of large representative samples, from both the United States and the United Kingdom, confirm this prediction.  In both countries, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to be liberals than less intelligent children.  For example, among the American sample, those who identify themselves as “very liberal” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as “very conservative” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8.

Which is just odd to treat as meaningful. Kids never have a firm grasp of what is going on in politics because they don't have the experience to understand what is at work. So who cares what the political beliefs of children are?

As far as the amygdala argument, you could say that liberals having an underdeveloped amygdala leads to them not having a proper response to threats to their environment. For instance you could argue liberals while wanting to be nice and let in refugees are ignoring a potential threat since 'refugees' have been frequently found to be sympathetic to terrorist causes in Europe. Essentially meaning they're overly naive.

When it comes to the livescience.com story suggesting that conservatives are prejudiced, I'm not actually seeing any link on the page to the study in question. Trying to search for what study this article is based on just turns up more links to the specific article so I can't see what they're actually doing, but I strongly suspect it's a tad bullshit like many 'studies' which amount to nothing more than surveys with leading questions.

I think you are likely reading more into clickbait 'news' articles than you really ought to. It's pretty easy for some writers to come up with some flamboyant headlines to grab clicks based on the most bullshit information.

Like this article from Livescience recently: Has the Large Hadron Collider Disproved the Existence of Ghosts?
http://www.livescience.com/57973-has-large-hadron-collider-disproved-existence-of-ghosts.html

How the fuck can something like that be an article? Why are you taking a site like this seriously?

Or this Psychologytoday site, which has such profound articles as "The science of clean" and "Nine signs you're really an introvert". This is about as bullshit a site as Buzzfeed for fuck's sake. These are not sites you should be using to judge people's political beliefs. These sites thrive on feeding you comforting bullshit that makes you feel better about yourself or just pisses you off, they are not aimed at making you more knowledgeable about anything.

The OP pretends that liberalism is a mental disorder, based on the opinion of a right-wing conservative pundit.

That is like asking a Nazi for their opinion of Jews, or a member of the KKK their opinion of blacks, or a right-wing conservative pundit their opinion of gays.

I don't think you're going to find many critiques of a group from the group itself. Would you expect to watch Fox News and find arguments in favor of Democrats' policies? Would you go to Salon.com to find arguments in favor of Trump? Would you go The New York Times to find non-fake news?

Whenever conservatives complain about liberal ideology, all they do is show that they don't understand it. It's like when Creationists make fun of evolution.

The OP pretends that liberalism is a mental disorder, based on the opinion of a right-wing conservative pundit.

That is like asking a Nazi for their opinion of Jews, or a member of the KKK their opinion of blacks, or a right-wing conservative pundit their opinion of gays.

In reality, real psychologists have weighed in on this topic.

The more educated someone is, the more liberal they tend to be.
The higher someone's IQ, the more Liberal they are.
Scientists tend to be overwhelmingly Liberal.
The states with the highest levels of education are Blue. The lowest ones are Red.
As Conservatives love to complain about, Hollywood is overwhelmingly Liberal- because Creativity is a Liberal characteristic.

As it turns out, Liberalism is a trait that advances the evolution of the species, while conservativism holds it back. Previously psychologists did not want to call Conservativism a mental disorder because of political backlash- now they are starting to be honest about it.

Why Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201003/why-liberals-are-more-intelligent-conservatives

Conservatives Big on Fear, Brain Study Finds
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-human-beast/201104/conservatives-big-fear-brain-study-finds

Differences in Conservative and Liberal Brains
http://2016election.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=005927

Misperceiving Bullshit as Profound Is Associated with Favorable Views of Cruz, Rubio, Trump and Conservatism
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0153419

Low IQ & Conservative Beliefs Linked to Prejudice
http://www.livescience.com/18132-intelligence-social-conservatism-racism.html

… now, I know the Milo clones here will respond with something snarky, but that is simply because they don't have anything intelligent to say.
But it is not their fault- they were just born that way.

They justify violence against those who they disagree with.  Don't like what someone is saying, riot and set the building his speaking in on fire.  If he's outside, so you can't set fire to the building, then sucker punch him.  If you even think someone might believe something you don't like, no proof needed, then you are completely right to beat them down and continue beating them while they lay unconscious on the ground.  Another lovely liberal tactic is to scream about sexual assault even when the video proves it never happened, in an attempt to justify your violence.  Block roads and prevent ambulances from getting through.

You want me to go fuck myself?  Nasty Nasty lib.  Over 59 Billion unborn babies murdered in their mother's wombs.  You people really are sick!

Going to TRY EXTREMELY HARD TO NOT BREAK THE RULES HERE.

Dude, way to necro your own dead thread with spam… There's only 7 billion people alive on the entire planet. You are seriously in need of real, legitimate, professional medical help... I'm serious.

Edit: Also, if you legitimately think that people having beliefs is mental disorder, SEE ABOVE…

Let me sum up this argument to the original poster… go fuck yourself. There, now we can all be done with this. Thanks.

You want me to go fuck myself?  Nasty Nasty lib.  Over 59 Billion unborn babies murdered in their mother's wombs.  You people really are sick!

Like the poster above, I didn't realize I'd stumbled into a Breitbart lunacy competition. I think that the forums and the site would be better without the politics and debate section.

You are willing to insult people, while complaining about having this section.

Quite telling.

If you don't like this section, you should just ignore it.