<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Utorrent vs BitTorrent]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I have been wondering what the differences between Utorrent and Bittorrent are for many years.  They are both made by the same company, and look and function the same… BUT there is a difference.  Utorrent downloads files much faster.  On my test, Utorrent's download rate was 3 times as fast.  Also.  Utorrent finds peers a lot faster than Bittorrent.</p>
<p dir="auto">So, I would suggest.. forget Bittorrent.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/15898/utorrent-vs-bittorrent</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 18:13:36 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/15898.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 08:55:48 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Utorrent vs BitTorrent on Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:32:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I prefer BitTorrent</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.gaytor.rent/post/122609</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.gaytor.rent/post/122609</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[dropear]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:32:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Utorrent vs BitTorrent on Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:54:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/frederick" aria-label="Profile: Frederick">@<bdi>Frederick</bdi></a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">They are both made by the same company, and look and function the same… BUT there is a difference.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">µTorrent has a much lower memory footprint than the program that Ludvig Strigeus developed it from, BitTorrent. Both still contain programming for adware (although in µTorrent this can be disabled).  Open-source clients that aren't monetized have even lower footprints. But like Popper says, I dont know if that makes them any "faster" so to speak.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.gaytor.rent/post/122605</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.gaytor.rent/post/122605</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Spintendo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:54:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Utorrent vs BitTorrent on Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:55:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I think that has something to do with being connectable or not, a pure setup issue (which can happen on both). bitTorrent got one or two additional functions, e.g. "DNA" (nobody needs that for torrenting IMHO).</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.gaytor.rent/post/122572</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.gaytor.rent/post/122572</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Popper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:55:08 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>