<![CDATA[Relationship between smoking and socioecominc status]]>The European Journal of Public Health and The Centers for Disease Control

| | % | |
| | Men | Women |
| Education | | |
| Higher | 23 | 13 |
| Secondary | 26 | 20 |
| Basic | 35 | 30 |
| Occupational status | | |
| Managers and professional | 22 | 13 |
| Semi-professionals | 24 | 18 |
| Routine non-manuals | 44 | 27 |
| Manual workers | 35 | 37 |
| Household income | | |
| Highest quartile | 21 | 17 |
| 3rd | 24 | 22 |
| 2nd | 29 | 25 |
| Lowest quartile | 39 | 29 |
| Housing tenure | | |
| Owner-occupier | 20 | 16 |
| Renter | 50 | 38 |

]]>https://community.gaytor.rent/topic/13285/relationship-between-smoking-and-socioecominc-statusRSS for NodeWed, 08 Apr 2026 16:15:24 GMTFri, 26 Dec 2014 01:09:01 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Relationship between smoking and socioecominc status on Mon, 29 Dec 2014 17:59:56 GMT]]>At least caffeine has therapeutic effects, an alcohol has no therapeutic effect.  It blocks anti-diuretic hormone, it causes an excess loss of B vitamins, which in turn can cause Korsakoff Syndrome.  Caffeine consumption of approximately 300 mg/day for 10 years has shown to decrease chances of having mental deteriorating diseases such as Alzheimmer's.  :cheerup: :angel2:

]]>https://community.gaytor.rent/post/115474https://community.gaytor.rent/post/115474Mon, 29 Dec 2014 17:59:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Relationship between smoking and socioecominc status on Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:57:03 GMT]]>As are alcohol and caffeine. What is your point?

]]>https://community.gaytor.rent/post/115377https://community.gaytor.rent/post/115377Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:57:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Relationship between smoking and socioecominc status on Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:13:46 GMT]]>Cigarettes and marijuana are drugs by the way.  :poorthing: :cheerup:

]]>https://community.gaytor.rent/post/115374https://community.gaytor.rent/post/115374Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:13:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Relationship between smoking and socioecominc status on Sun, 28 Dec 2014 23:16:48 GMT]]>Look at how the studies are conducted not to mention that hospitals and clinics are starting to test  you for nicotine. As far as smoking and being poor no I don't beleive theres much of a connection there I believe there is a connection for drugs but not smoking. I believe a lot more of the difference is in reporting discrepancies.

]]>https://community.gaytor.rent/post/115366https://community.gaytor.rent/post/115366Sun, 28 Dec 2014 23:16:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Relationship between smoking and socioecominc status on Sun, 28 Dec 2014 21:34:14 GMT]]>Whatever, suit yourself and be in denial.  The less educated and poorer you are, the more likely you are to smoke, vape, "hit a bong", "toke" etc.
:crap:

]]>https://community.gaytor.rent/post/115359https://community.gaytor.rent/post/115359Sun, 28 Dec 2014 21:34:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Relationship between smoking and socioecominc status on Sat, 27 Dec 2014 23:06:59 GMT]]>Okay I think the data from most smoking studies is highly distorted living in the US I can't comment on a European study but many who are of a higher economic standing or who work in a hospital or public building are more prone to lieing if asked if they smoke. Additionally in the US if the number of packs of cigarettes bought a year were divided by 365 and then divided by the people who smoked according to the CDC then you have people smoking something like 100 packs a day.

]]>https://community.gaytor.rent/post/115186https://community.gaytor.rent/post/115186Sat, 27 Dec 2014 23:06:59 GMT